Assessments /

Personality questionnaire

OPQ · Personality assessment · Work styles questionnaire

Timed practice set

5 questions, 2 minutes.

What it measures

How you typically prefer to work: with people, with ideas and with pressure. Employers compare your profile with the demands of the role. There are no right answers, and the questionnaire is built to notice when someone answers as the person they think is wanted rather than as themselves.

How it appears

  • Forced choiceThree or four statements in a block; you pick the one most like you and the one least like you. Every statement in a block is desirable, so you cannot be best at all of them.
  • Rating scaleA statement and a five-point agree-to-disagree scale.
  • Behaviour-basedShort, game-like tasks or scenarios whose choices are scored for style rather than for a right answer.

Timing

104 questions in 35 minutes.

Untimed. Twenty seconds is enough to read a block and answer from your typical behaviour; longer usually means you are calculating an answer rather than giving one.

Source

The OPQ32 "comprises over a hundred question items" with no time limit stated, assessmentday.com's SHL page, read on 14 September 2026. The drill uses 20 seconds an item, the pace of 104 items in about 35 minutes, so that practice has a clock.

How to tell it apart

  • Situational judgementSituational judgement has a keyed most effective response. Personality has no key; it asks what you are like, not what works.
  • Verbal reasoningVerbal reasoning is timed, scored and about a passage. Personality is untimed, profiled and about you.

The method

Answer as yourself at work over the last year, consistently, and let the profile be true.

  1. Before you start, picture yourself at work over the last year, not your best day and not the person the advert describes. Answer from that.
  2. Read each statement for what it actually says. "I keep a detailed plan for my week" is about planning, not about being organised in general.
  3. In a forced-choice block, pick the statement that is most true of you and the one that is least true, even when all of them sound good. That is what the format expects.
  4. On a rating scale, use the whole scale. A row of middle answers gives no profile, and no profile is read as evasion.
  5. Answer the same way each time a trait comes round. The same trait is asked in several forms, and inconsistency is measured.
  6. Do not calculate what the role wants. A profile bent towards the role is unstable across the questionnaire, and a role you had to pretend for is a role you will not enjoy.
  7. Keep moving. Twenty seconds an item is enough to answer as yourself; longer is time spent constructing someone else.

Traps to know

  • Answering as the ideal candidate

    Choosing the statement the role seems to want in every block. Forced-choice blocks make this impossible to do consistently, and the inconsistency is what the employer sees.

    Setup A block offers: I keep a detailed plan; I enjoy persuading people; I stay calm when plans change; I prefer to work things out alone. The role is in sales.

    The trap Choosing persuading as most like you because the role is sales, when planning is what is actually most like you.

    The escape Pick what is most true of you. A sales role staffed by people pretending to like persuading does not work for anyone.

  • The neutral middle

    Rating every statement three out of five feels safe. It produces a profile with no shape, and employers treat no shape as no information, or as a candidate managing the test.

    Setup Twenty statements on a five-point scale, and you have answered neither agree nor disagree to twelve of them.

    The trap Staying in the middle to avoid committing.

    The escape Ask, of each statement, is this more true of me than not? Then move off the middle in that direction.

  • Treating it as a test with a pass mark

    There is no score to beat. Trying to get everything right makes answers slower and less consistent, which is the one thing that does register.

    Setup The questionnaire says there are no right or wrong answers, and you read that as something tests always say.

    The trap Working out which answer scores higher on each item.

    The escape Believe it. The profile is compared with the role; the only way to fail is to describe someone who is not you.

  • Reading the role into every statement

    A statement about preferring routine reads as a trap for a graduate role, so the candidate answers against it. Most roles need some of every style, and the questionnaire is not asking about the role.

    Setup Statement: I prefer work where I know what each day will involve.

    The trap Disagreeing because the advert said fast-paced.

    The escape Answer the statement. Many people who thrive in fast-paced roles also like knowing what the day holds.

Worked examples

Example 1

From the four statements, choose the one that is most like you and the one that is least like you. There is no right answer; this walkthrough shows what each statement is asking about.

  • AI keep a detailed plan for my week.
  • BI enjoy persuading people to see things my way.
  • CI stay calm when plans change at short notice.
  • DI prefer to work things out on my own.
Show the working
  1. A forced-choice block. Each statement sits on a different scale, so picking one as most like you does not mark you down on the others; it just says which is most you.
  2. A is about structure and planning. B is about influence, wanting to persuade. C is about composure under change. D is about independence, preferring to work alone.
  3. Choose most and least from what is true of you at work over the last year. Here A is taken as most like you and D as least, for someone who plans and likes working with others. Your pair will be different, and should be.
  4. Consistency is what matters: when planning comes round again in another block, the answer should point the same way.

Why not the others

  • B. Not wrong. Choosing it as most like you signals a preference for influencing others. Choosing it as least signals that persuasion is not what you enjoy.
  • C. Not wrong. Choosing it as most like you signals composure when things change. Choosing it as least does not mean you panic; it means the other three are more like you.
  • D. Not wrong. Choosing it as most like you signals independence. Choosing it as least, as in this walkthrough, signals you would rather work with others.

Example 2

Rate the statement on the scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree: "I find it easy to tell a colleague when I disagree with them." There is no right answer; this walkthrough shows how to answer it honestly.

  • AStrongly disagree
  • BDisagree
  • CNeither agree nor disagree
  • DAgree
  • EStrongly agree
Show the working
  1. A rating-scale item on assertiveness, how readily you voice disagreement.
  2. Recall real cases from the last year. Did you say so when you disagreed, in meetings, with your manager, with peers? Most of the time, some of the time, rarely?
  3. Move off the middle in the direction the cases point. Someone who usually says so, but not always, lands on Agree. That is what this walkthrough shows.
  4. Avoid the two ends unless they are true. Strongly agree says you find it easy every time and with everyone; strongly disagree says you almost never do.

Why not the others

  • A. Not wrong if true. It signals that voicing disagreement is hard for you almost always.
  • B. Not wrong if true. It signals that you more often keep disagreement to yourself.
  • C. Not wrong if true, but the middle should be rare. If it is your honest answer, fine; if it is a way of not deciding, it gives no profile.
  • E. Not wrong if true. It signals that disagreement comes easily with anyone, which is a strong claim; the questionnaire will ask it again another way.

Ready for the clock?

5 questions, 2 minutes.

Timed drills

5 · 2